Is it true that with a 2nd pregnancy that labour time is possibly shorter?

Answers (11)

Answered by Sybella - Mar. 4, 2012 7:44am

My first was 46hrs, Second 22hrs and Third was 11hrs so mine halved each time. Hopefully this one will be quicker!

255 out of 523 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by JessicaWall11 - Mar. 1, 2012 1:02am

Im definatly saying to those of you who had under 10 hr labours your lucky. My first one was 28 hrs, and I'm praying this one will go alot faster. but i still have time im only 10 wks

269 out of 562 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by AmpMommy - Feb. 29, 2012 7:37pm

Generally speaking yes. For me it wasn't true though. My 2nd was my longest labor (24 hours!!!) My first was 7 hours and my 3rd was 2 hours. Apparently my 2nd kiddo wanted to take his sweet time though...lol

276 out of 547 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by Mamaof2soon3 - Feb. 29, 2012 5:03pm

My first was 5hrs and my second was 3hrs. Good luck!! (this was duplicate because I wasnt signed in when I answered.) :)

273 out of 548 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by a guest - Feb. 29, 2012 5:00pm

my first was 5hrs and my second was 3hrs. Good Luck

261 out of 538 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by Leniana - Feb. 29, 2012 3:23pm

Studies have shown that second labors are statistically shorter by a short amount (I forget the exact amount, I want to say appr 2 hours). Of course that is just statistics, everyone will be a little different. When you are going through it, it will all seem like forever anyways LOL.

255 out of 534 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by ilovebabybumps - Feb. 29, 2012 11:33am

to be honest both of my labours where around 6hours from start to finish but i found i coped with it better because i knew what was going on.

258 out of 546 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by a guest - Feb. 29, 2012 5:19am

My first was 8HRS and my second was 6hrs i will see how the third one gos in nov.i just found out i was pregnant with #3.

304 out of 599 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by babycarnell - Feb. 28, 2012 9:33pm

My first was 20 hours and oh so painful, my second was half an hour and lovely! Fingers crossed for u! :)

307 out of 613 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answered by lisserb - Feb. 28, 2012 9:07pm

I haven't personally experience two labors, yet...my first was 10 hours. I have several friends though, who have definitely had faster labors. One of them very nearly didn't make it to the hospital, and another went so fast she delivered twins without an epidural because there wasn't time for one. Only one of my friends has had longer labors with subsequent babies.

I'm also hoping for a shorter labor this time. :)

289 out of 572 found this answer helpful

Was this answer helpful? Yes No

Answer This Question

You are not logged in.
Log in or Register to post an answer to this question.

Questions & Answers

Q: Is it true that with a 2nd pregnancy that labour time is possibly shorter?

Answers (11)

Answer This Question

Other Questions in Labour & Delivery

Track and Share My Pregnancy!

Question Categories

Get More CMP & Stay Connected!

Are You Trying to Conceive?